|
|

This is the second edition of the "Loose Change" documentary that claims the government has been covering up what really happened on 9/11 and suggests who was responsible. Examine the evidence and make your own conclusion. This video is 80 minutes long but I'm sure some of you will enjoy it.
 
Posted by: Scottjpw on the 06th 2006f March 2006 | Comments: (58) |


Uhhh 
 Posts: 227 |
Posted by: Uhhh on the 06th 2006f Mar @ 09:28 |
|
| very interesting, I'd be interested in reading, watching someone refute the claims made in this video. |

Mongoose 
 Posts: 56 |
Posted by: Mongoose on the 06th 2006f Mar @ 09:35 |
|
Here's a good starting place:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loose_Change_%28
video%29 |

Rybo 
 Posts: 213 |
Posted by: Rybo on the 06th 2006f Mar @ 10:46 |
|
| Crazy shit. |

SopieMun.. 
 Posts: 490 |
Posted by: SopieMunky on the 06th 2006f Mar @ 12:39 |
|
| I'm going to sit down and watch this entire movie one day. I just need to find the time. |

pigg 
 Posts: 127 |
Posted by: pigg on the 06th 2006f Mar @ 12:45 |
|
| I have watched it all and find it very interesting. there is another 1 on kontraband.com search animations for pentagon conspiracy, it is only a few mins long but it really makes you think. let me know if you watch it. |

Tyrfingr 
 Posts: 9846 |
Posted by: Tyrfingr on the 06th 2006f Mar @ 12:54 |
|
Took a while to watch through the video, but it was well worth every minute of it. It contained alot of new information that i didn't know of...
A very well made effort to raise questions that most people would be interested to get some answers to, and it contains alot of highly interesting and explosive stuff to think about. |

JAB_CT 
 Posts: 276 |
Posted by: JAB_CT on the 06th 2006f Mar @ 16:06 |
|
Ive seen this a few times. There are MANY good points however I still dont believe the US govt was responsible. What i believe, is that the terrorists were way better prepared than we were led to believe. I think that they somehow got ahold of a tomahawk missle but we are not giving them the satisfaction of admitting it. We will never see the full pentagon footage.
I think they somehow got jets and put a bomb on the bottom of them from a undisclosed location, but we wont admit it.
I think they planted explosives all over the WTC but we wont give them credit on that either.
And I dont think Al-quada or whoever actually went there and did this pre-planning, but paid americans to help them. Money talks. Its a shame. And we'll never admit to that. Anyone been watching 24 this season? Same thing happened to one of the presidents inside men. (guy who hung himself when caught) They made him look like a hero instead of telling the public he was working for terrorists. I think 9/11 is along them lines somehow.
The gold thing was interesting, but im not totally convinced on that one.
I still believe all that was terrorists, but we cant say how organized they were. It would cause quite a panic and make the US look very vulnerable if it was uncovered.
STILL..... I want to know the truth like the rest of yas. |

sangwria 
 Posts: 70 |
Posted by: sangwria on the 06th 2006f Mar @ 16:22 |
|
Maybe you refuse to believe a few people including Bush have manipulated bilions. It's too ugly.
What are "terrorists" ? Silly people that just wanna dominate the world (like in dragonballz) ? No, that's how Bush is.
And anyway, binladen is a CIA's cover.
Quit your "patriotism". |

Nemesis8.. 
 Posts: 46 |
Posted by: Nemesis80 on the 06th 2006f Mar @ 18:23 |
|
| Quote: | On 06-03-06 22:22 sangwria wrote:
Maybe you refuse to believe a few people including Bush have manipulated bilions. It's too ugly.
What are "terrorists" ? Silly people that just wanna dominate the world (like in dragonballz) ? No, that's how Bush is.
And anyway, binladen is a CIA's cover.
Quit your "patriotism". |
Now, now, lets not start a flame war, it is useless and a waist of time.
Personally I think this is an interesting video, due to the fac that they present some details that were left in the dark... I never jump quickly to "consperacy" stories, but lets not forget some set ups that were used in the past, such as the japanese false terrorist attack on a train bridge, they accused China to be responsible and attacked them (the real reason was beacause of japans lacks natural exploitable ressources such as iron, gold, fuel, terrotorial space, etc witch would had made a good cover up and reason to declare war and gain terrain and sempatys from allied countrys...), but the USA discovered the set up and setted an embargo on japan making the emperor nuts: thus japan attacked pearl arbor for the USA to remove the embargo but instead gave the USA a reason to motivate its people to go to war making the usa a WW2 player...
Still what an interesting movie  |

Rybo 
 Posts: 213 |
Posted by: Rybo on the 06th 2006f Mar @ 19:11 |
|
| I thought the most interesting part was the amount of gold under those damn towers. Surely that gives motive, plus the damn war Bush then had permission to start. Those scenes of the obvious explosives in the Towers while they were collapsing just shocked me. There is no way those terrorists planted those bombs in the towers. Not to mention that Tower 7 fell so convienently. Whole video just really blew my mind. Not that I think everything they said was true. I live 15 min from Hopkins airport and Glenn Research Center. I've seen them shut that highway down before with no explanation, no local news coverage. They only media it gets is on our local talk radio and it just seems not enough people care to discover the truth about that place. |

sangwria 
 Posts: 70 |
Posted by: sangwria on the 06th 2006f Mar @ 19:29 |
|
| Quote: | On 07-03-06 00:23 Nemesis80 wrote:
[..]
Personally I think this is an interesting video, due to the fac that they present some details that were left in the dark... I never jump quickly to "consperacy" stories, .. |
What was left in the dark about the consperacy (if not the proof it's a consperacy) ?..  |

Nemesis8.. 
 Posts: 46 |
Posted by: Nemesis80 on the 06th 2006f Mar @ 19:37 |
|
| Quote: | On 07-03-06 01:29 sangwria wrote:
[..]
What was left in the dark about the consperacy (if not the proof it's a consperacy) ?.. |
Just what you might call "important details that would prouve it"
 |

spencerh.. 
 Posts: 177 |
Posted by: spencerhead on the 06th 2006f Mar @ 20:37 |
|
| the owner of the seventh tower admitted, on a program that was aired on pbs, that they "pulled" the seventh tower. that makes me wonder why they already had explosives in the building and whether they had them in other buildings as well. after watching this video, it's hard to believe that the government didnt pull off the attacks, however, like uhh pointed out, i'd like to see the arguments against this video. since the video is only being aired on the internet, the people who made it dont have to have any journalistic integrity and they could be completely lying. i guess ill go check out the wikipedia link. |

sangwria 
 Posts: 70 |
Posted by: sangwria on the 06th 2006f Mar @ 23:05 |
|
surry nem, my english is poor
now, let's go kill bush or somthing |

Rybo 
 Posts: 213 |
Posted by: Rybo on the 07th 2006f Mar @ 00:34 |
|
| I was kinda hoping somebody would whack him in Pakistan. I really had my fingers crossed. |

klkh55 
 Posts: 1 |
Posted by: klkh55 on the 07th 2006f Mar @ 00:43 |
|
| i posted that damn video.. or gave the link.. i hate it how people are NOW finding out about this stuff.. |

Chron 
 Posts: 14 |
Posted by: Chron on the 07th 2006f Mar @ 01:43 |
|
-first of all. who is the guy telling u this?
-where did he get the information?
-if you're so sure that the goverment did this, why dont u sue them? |

juanandr.. 
 Posts: 5 |
Posted by: juanandres on the 07th 2006f Mar @ 02:20 |
|
| You Bush bashing America haters have to be a little carefull. So quick to legitimize these conspiracy theories. Your so quick to dismiss anyithing Bush says, why wouldn't you have just as much concern about the truth about this video. A great job may have been done taking pieces of information(out of context) to legitimize this groups agenda, just like you say the Bush administration did in order to go to war with Iraq. The bottom line why would Bush do this. Yes I do believe the government does things behind our back hidden in secracy. And yes some of those things were wrong including countless ones in the Bush admin. But what reason would bush have to do this. The war on terror is very complex and we may never know what truly is going on. All we can do is understand a country is a business and therefor must be treated as one. Your boss doesn't let you know everything that goes on in your job right? But at the end of the day the business must succeed. Get off each others nuts and read this: http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defen
se/1227842.html?page=1&c=y |

Hankmeis.. 
 Posts: 1 |
Posted by: Hankmeister on the 07th 2006f Mar @ 05:52 |
|
I should have read the previous post before registering to comment here since he's dead on about Popular Mechanics totally debunking these conspiracy kooks that liberals and Bush-basher just love to believe in. It's almost we're dealing with cult members, cult members who will believe any garbage that a good brainwasher can send their way.
Popular Mechanics has no political agenda other than looking at the physical evidence and the irrefutable testimony of those that best fit into the evidentiary puzzle. I watched some of this conspiracy nutball video and its a classic example of something resembling the old Soviet-style propaganda which plays very loose with the facts and establishes its case by "reading between the lines" of the actual evidence itself.
If you bought into the video, congratulations, you've just proven yourself capable of being thoroughly brainwashed ... and I feel very sorry for you because a day will come when a real, manipulative liar will come along and you'll follow him just like a lemming over a cliff.
Check out: http://www.911-strike.com/debunking.htm |

Tyrfingr 
 Posts: 9846 |
Posted by: Tyrfingr on the 07th 2006f Mar @ 06:11 |
|
I think there were alot of incompetence and people doing their outmost to cover their asses in the wake of the towers.. And i believe that the goverment sat on enough information to have been prepared.
But i dont believe that explosives were placed in the towers in beforehand... My theory is that the puffs of smoke and what people interpreted as explosions seconds before the towers fell. Has led me to think about the effects of concrete fundaments giving away. The concrete structure in the WTC buildings were of such proportions that they would undoubtedly give off tons of smoke when they collapsed within a very small timeframe. And the sound they would have to make as they snapped would also have been LOUD, there were several of these fundaments everywhere, so when they gave away you would have several loud bangs, coupled with a whole shitload of smoke and dust. |

paul_spa.. 
 Posts: 214 |
Posted by: paul_spangle on the 07th 2006f Mar @ 06:27 |
|
| next thing, you'll be telling me JFK getting shot, was a set up and involved more than one shooter. |

Robert 
 Posts: 70 |
Posted by: Robert on the 07th 2006f Mar @ 06:43 |
|
| war =$ |

Tyrfingr 
 Posts: 9846 |
Posted by: Tyrfingr on the 07th 2006f Mar @ 07:02 |
|
Im not letting myself be easily convinced towards any side in extreme cases, and im defineately not hurrying to jump aboard the conspiracy train when something happens... As for the WTC, i just find the demolition theory to be too sinister to believe at once.
This link is quite interesting as well.
http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/slides.
html |

JAB_CT 
 Posts: 276 |
Posted by: JAB_CT on the 07th 2006f Mar @ 14:43 |
|
Well, about buying into this theory, id really like to hear someone or some article explain the things in that video. The links above just say that there are people who will make up conspiracies, and they poke fun at them, but they arent explaining any of it. And the popular mech link is broken.
I only want to know 1 thing.
After 4 1/2 years, why hasnt the 3 or 4 full motion videos of the pentagon crash been released???
LET US SEE THE DAMN VIDEO!!! |

juanandr.. 
 Posts: 5 |
Posted by: juanandres on the 07th 2006f Mar @ 15:15 |
|
| JAB you a big boy to soime research I am sure your will run across the popular mech. article. Go to google and search for debunking "the truth about 9/11" or you can try this link: http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defen
se/1227842.html |

BigupGB 
 Posts: 660 |
Posted by: BigupGB on the 07th 2006f Mar @ 16:18 |
|
| i havnt watched the video so i cant express an opinion but isn't there anyone who thinks it might be a load of bullshit? |

Nemesis8.. 
 Posts: 46 |
Posted by: Nemesis80 on the 07th 2006f Mar @ 17:15 |
|
| Quote: | On 07-03-06 07:43 Chron wrote:
-first of all. who is the guy telling u this?
-where did he get the information?
-if you're so sure that the goverment did this, why dont u sue them? |
you know the names that appears when the movie is over? READ THEM BEFORE ASKING!
 |

JAB_CT 
 Posts: 276 |
Posted by: JAB_CT on the 07th 2006f Mar @ 19:07 |
|
OK I saw the popular Mechanic Debinking pages.
Umm they didnt explain anything? Im bummed. No mention of why the pentagon videos havent been released. No mention of why the 47 pillars per building of WTC pulverized instead of being weakened or bent by heat. I saw a documentary anim that shows if pancaking took place, each floor would collapse onto the next one down, but at least some of the central pillars would remain. See 911revisited.com for the video.
No mention of why NO BUILDING IN HISTORY ever came close to collapsing from fire, including some that consumed 20 floors burning for 48 hours. Including the Empire State Building, slammed by a B52 bomber many decades ago.
All that site did was quote other people and give their own theories.
WTF I WANT ANSWERS STILL!!!!!
 |

Mongoose 
 Posts: 56 |
Posted by: Mongoose on the 07th 2006f Mar @ 19:35 |
|
| Quote: | On 08-03-06 01:07 JAB_CT wrote:
OK I saw the popular Mechanic Debinking pages.
Umm they didnt explain anything? Im bummed. No mention of why the pentagon videos havent been released. No mention of why the 47 pillars per building of WTC pulverized instead of being weakened or bent by heat. I saw a documentary anim that shows if pancaking took place, each floor would collapse onto the next one down, but at least some of the central pillars would remain. See 911revisited.com for the video.
No mention of why NO BUILDING IN HISTORY ever came close to collapsing from fire, including some that consumed 20 floors burning for 48 hours. Including the Empire State Building, slammed by a B52 bomber many decades ago.
All that site did was quote other people and give their own theories.
WTF I WANT ANSWERS STILL!!!!!
 |
It was a B-25 not a B-52. Empire state building is also built differently to the WTC. That behemoth will stand for a bloody long time.  |

spencerh.. 
 Posts: 177 |
Posted by: spencerhead on the 07th 2006f Mar @ 20:59 |
|
| The popular mechanics article doesn't really seem to answer many important questions. that doesnt mean i'm convinced bush did it, i just want to see more evidence. |

Rybo 
 Posts: 213 |
Posted by: Rybo on the 07th 2006f Mar @ 21:03 |
|
| Quote: | On 07-03-06 22:18 BigupGB wrote:
i havnt watched the video so i cant express an opinion but isn't there anyone who thinks it might be a load of bullshit? |
watch it, you'll be suprised. |

xeno 
 Posts: 126 |
Posted by: xeno on the 08th 2006f Mar @ 01:51 |
|
| I for one, think that this could be true. Anything can be true. The people who say these conspiracies are false are sheep who follow what authorities tell them. And people who believe in these conspiracy theories are sheep and hate authority. One thing is true about all of this. The government is withholding information of an attack on the USA. That in itself speaks volumes. |

spencerh.. 
 Posts: 177 |
Posted by: spencerhead on the 08th 2006f Mar @ 02:29 |
|
well said, xeno.  |

H_TOWN_M.. 
 Posts: 6278 |
Posted by: H_TOWN_MEX on the 08th 2006f Mar @ 03:42 |
|
VERY INTERESTING THIS MOVIE EXPLAINS A LOT OF WHAT REALLY HAPPENED IN 9/11. I'LL REALLY LIKED IT A LOT. GOOD MOVIE AND THE ONLY FUCK UP THING ABOUT ALL THIS SHIT IS THAT THEY SAY THAT BUSH SR. WANTS TO RE-ELECT AMERICANS WILL BE REALLY MORONS IF HE GETS RE-ELECTED PLEASE DONT VOTE FOR THAT MOTHERFUCKER!!!!!!!!!!!  |

JAB_CT 
 Posts: 276 |
Posted by: JAB_CT on the 08th 2006f Mar @ 06:39 |
|
I have yet to find anything on the web that totally debunks this video. Most sites just say it cant be true, or people who believe it are dopes, or they quote people saying the opposite, etc. None of them actually give explanations on how this cannot be true. THATS SCARY!
Like ive said in my first reply above, im not convinced the US govt was involved. What I think is that the US govt is hiding how well organized the attacks were, to avoid being called dopes themselves. And they refuse to tell us that some crooked americans helped for a large fee. I consider myself a patriot, i love my country, but this is so obvious that things are being hidden.
Like ive said, at least 3 seperate cameras filmed the Pentagon attack, its been 4+ yrs now, whats the big deal in seeing it???
Instead they release 5 frames of a film dated 9/12 at 5pm, which only shows a blast. They can take them 5 frames and stick them up their ass! I want to see a few minutes worth, with the attack coming at 30 seconds into the film. According to the govt, its obvious a 125 foot wingspan boeing crashed and fit through a 16foot hole, leaving nothing on the outside, so ok then, SHOW ME!!!!!  |

paul_spa.. 
 Posts: 214 |
Posted by: paul_spangle on the 08th 2006f Mar @ 09:18 |
|
Eh? You can quite clearly see these 3 films at www.pentagonwebcam.com
Just tap in the date and time, u want to see, and hey presto! |

SenOne 
 Posts: 1 |
Posted by: SenOne on the 08th 2006f Mar @ 10:23 |
|
All I want to say is do I get any credit for getting this video posted. I remember telling others to watch it in the comments section of an earlier clip from a month ago. If anyone remembers please tell me.  |

Rybo 
 Posts: 213 |
Posted by: Rybo on the 08th 2006f Mar @ 15:35 |
|
| No, you get no credit. You suck, faggot. |

Junior 
 Posts: 2 |
Posted by: Junior on the 08th 2006f Mar @ 16:26 |
|
| Bunch of morons who believe this video. The bigger morons are the one's who say that the PM article doesn't explain anything. Either you're stupid and can't understand what you're reading or you didn't go to the article. The PM article debunks all these bullshit conspiracy theories. How can there be so many goddamn morons out there ? |

Funbags 
 Posts: 1048 |
Posted by: Funbags on the 08th 2006f Mar @ 16:32 |
|
| Quote: | On 08-03-06 16:23 SenOne wrote:
All I want to say is do I get any credit for getting this video posted. I remember telling others to watch it in the comments section of an earlier clip from a month ago. If anyone remembers please tell me. |
So its your fucking fault
 |

JAB_CT 
 Posts: 276 |
Posted by: JAB_CT on the 08th 2006f Mar @ 17:10 |
|
| Quote: | On 08-03-06 22:26 Junior wrote:
Bunch of morons who believe this video. The bigger morons are the one's who say that the PM article doesn't explain anything. Either you're stupid and can't understand what you're reading or you didn't go to the article. The PM article debunks all these bullshit conspiracy theories. How can there be so many goddamn morons out there ? |
Dude, it doesnt debunk anything! Heres a recap on the 10 things that PM covered.
1) A pod or bomb is visible below the 2nd WTC jet.
Who cares?
2)No fighters were scrambled.
So what?
3)Melting point of steel.
The fuel burned off in 10 minutes and the it was the carpeting and furniture that brought the towers down.
Cmon now be serious. Thats the first time in history something like that happened from burning carpets, which dont reach temps anywhere near where steel melts.
4)siesmograph picks up shakes.
Big deal.
5)Did a plane hit the pentagon?
One guy says " if you expected the wing to punch a hole in the building, it didnt happen."
It DIDNT happen?? No shit! So where is it?
6)Windows in the pentagon were intact.
Yawn...
7)No plane parts found.
Someone said they held parts of the plane and a body.
Umm ok, and now everyone is convinced? Alot died that day, if he can find a body, they shouldve found the plane. End of story.
8)small jet seen flying over spot where flight 93 crashed.
Big deal.
9)One of flight 93s engines was found some distance from the crash site.
Big deal.
10) Flight 93 was shot down.
whether it was or wasnt, it doesnt interest me.
So the PM article doesnt debunk squat that is important.
And to Paul, the pentagon webcam link doesnt work or even exist. I also tried googling and came up with nothing, so nice try. Only 5 doctored frames have ever been released. Type in a date and time and watch... verrrrry funny. |

Junior 
 Posts: 2 |
Posted by: Junior on the 08th 2006f Mar @ 17:21 |
|
| Quote: | On 08-03-06 23:10 JAB_CT wrote:
[..]
Dude, it doesnt debunk anything! Heres a recap on the 10 things that PM covered.
1) A pod or bomb is visible below the 2nd WTC jet.
Who cares?
2)No fighters were scrambled.
So what?
3)Melting point of steel.
The fuel burned off in 10 minutes and the it was the carpeting and furniture that brought the towers down.
Cmon now be serious. Thats the first time in history something like that happened from burning carpets, which dont reach temps anywhere near where steel melts.
4)siesmograph picks up shakes.
Big deal.
5)Did a plane hit the pentagon?
One guy says " if you expected the wing to punch a hole in the building, it didnt happen."
It DIDNT happen?? No shit! So where is it?
6)Windows in the pentagon were intact.
Yawn...
7)No plane parts found.
Someone said they held parts of the plane and a body.
Umm ok, and now everyone is convinced? Alot died that day, if he can find a body, they shouldve found the plane. End of story.
8)small jet seen flying over spot where flight 93 crashed.
Big deal.
9)One of flight 93s engines was found some distance from the crash site.
Big deal.
10) Flight 93 was shot down.
whether it was or wasnt, it doesnt interest me.
So the PM article doesnt debunk squat that is important.
And to Paul, the pentagon webcam link doesnt work or even exist. I also tried googling and came up with nothing, so nice try. Only 5 doctored frames have ever been released. Type in a date and time and watch... verrrrry funny.
|
That ain't no recap. Read the goddamn article. It explains everything. It doesn't say burning carpet brought down the towers. You're being ridIculous. Reading your post was a waste of my time that I'm never getting back. Thing is, you want to believe that it's some government conspiracy and when presented with proof that completely ruins your conspiracy theory, it doesn't matter because you want to believe your little kiddie theory. Too many movies for you, jack. Oh, here's another link for you about the Pentagon : http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread796
55/pg1
You're a wack job. Thanks for coming out though. |

sangwria 
 Posts: 70 |
Posted by: sangwria on the 08th 2006f Mar @ 17:52 |
|
Bush is just a dictator and a drug, weapons, oil dealer along with CIA, Wall Street etc.
It's just it goes on TV and is shown as
"legal". It's the worse mafia ever.
HEY ! CAN'T YOU SEE ? SHEEPS ! 
Maybe American people are being hypnotised with radio waves not being able to realize that.
Why would somebody suddenly want to rule a country ? For people wellness ? ho-ho-ho ..
Anyway, weak people won't understand but ..they are useless  |

JAB_CT 
 Posts: 276 |
Posted by: JAB_CT on the 08th 2006f Mar @ 18:40 |
|
junior, you didnt read my posts. I do NOT think the govt was behind 9/11. Ive said that more than once above.
And what I wrote was a summary of the PM article. It didnt provide any proof of anything and only 2 of the topics were worth trying to debunk.
However, the link you left at abovetopsecret was MUCH better at debunking the pentagon attack. Alot of photos with an actual explanation and proof of what youre looking at. Im more convinced a 757 hit it after reading that article.
But i would still like to see more than 5 frames and would like to know why the videos havent been released. |

BigupGB 
 Posts: 660 |
Posted by: BigupGB on the 08th 2006f Mar @ 18:59 |
|
Bet it took a while to make up the load of bullshit in this video, well faked and proffesionally put together. Almost had me convinced.
The only conspiracy thingy i believe is the fake moon landing. there is so much evidence to show that the moon landings were faked. google it and see wat u think. |

Tyrfingr 
 Posts: 9846 |
Posted by: Tyrfingr on the 08th 2006f Mar @ 19:22 |
|
| It was the same thing about Area-51, everyone believed in the stories of aliens and UFO's that was widespread amongst conspiracy theorists. When in fact it was all about captured secret German WWII projects, such as Hortens deltawing. |

Rybo 
 Posts: 213 |
Posted by: Rybo on the 08th 2006f Mar @ 20:16 |
|
| Did you work at Area-51? I don't think so. So shut the fuck up. |

BigupGB 
 Posts: 660 |
Posted by: BigupGB on the 08th 2006f Mar @ 20:41 |
|
| Area 51 is also where they were meant to have faked the moon landings, im not sure about that tho. ALiens, wat a load of bullshit |

spencerh.. 
 Posts: 177 |
Posted by: spencerhead on the 08th 2006f Mar @ 20:55 |
|
| Quote: | On 08-03-06 23:10 JAB_CT wrote:
[..]
Dude, it doesnt debunk anything! Heres a recap on the 10 things that PM covered.
1) A pod or bomb is visible below the 2nd WTC jet.
Who cares?
2)No fighters were scrambled.
So what?
3)Melting point of steel.
The fuel burned off in 10 minutes and the it was the carpeting and furniture that brought the towers down.
Cmon now be serious. Thats the first time in history something like that happened from burning carpets, which dont reach temps anywhere near where steel melts.
4)siesmograph picks up shakes.
Big deal.
5)Did a plane hit the pentagon?
One guy says " if you expected the wing to punch a hole in the building, it didnt happen."
It DIDNT happen?? No shit! So where is it?
6)Windows in the pentagon were intact.
Yawn...
7)No plane parts found.
Someone said they held parts of the plane and a body.
Umm ok, and now everyone is convinced? Alot died that day, if he can find a body, they shouldve found the plane. End of story.
8)small jet seen flying over spot where flight 93 crashed.
Big deal.
9)One of flight 93s engines was found some distance from the crash site.
Big deal.
10) Flight 93 was shot down.
whether it was or wasnt, it doesnt interest me.
So the PM article doesnt debunk squat that is important.
And to Paul, the pentagon webcam link doesnt work or even exist. I also tried googling and came up with nothing, so nice try. Only 5 doctored frames have ever been released. Type in a date and time and watch... verrrrry funny.
|
props, jab.... exactly what i was thinking. junior should pay more attention to your posts.  |

xeno 
 Posts: 126 |
Posted by: xeno on the 09th 2006f Mar @ 00:06 |
|
| Jab never said the American Gov't did it. He just wants more evidence, like everyone here. There is a cover-up, we know there are 4 videos that show a plane or something hitting the Pentagon, but the gov't isnt releasing it. How can those videos be so dangerous in that it cant be shown to the public? |

Breadman 
 Posts: 241 |
Posted by: Breadman on the 09th 2006f Mar @ 04:23 |
|
| Quote: | On 06-03-06 18:39 SopieMunky wrote:
I'm going to sit down and watch this entire movie one day. I just need to find the time. |
Same as sopie, wen i have time , Love watchin these clips , cause i know that bush must of been behind this! I HATE BUSH
But Not All Bush , if u know wat i mean  |

Tyrfingr 
 Posts: 9846 |
Posted by: Tyrfingr on the 12th 2006f Mar @ 22:42 |
|
| Quote: | On 09-03-06 02:16 Rybo wrote:
Did you work at Area-51? I don't think so. So shut the fuck up. |
Hahahaha! 
Being touchy there fella ? |

Funbags 
 Posts: 1048 |
Posted by: Funbags on the 13th 2006f Mar @ 02:53 |
|
| Quote: | On 09-03-06 02:41 BigupGB wrote:
Area 51 is also where they were meant to have faked the moon landings, im not sure about that tho. ALiens, wat a load of bullshit |
I would give the alien theorists more creedence than the Bush planned 9/11 followers.  |

finnishg.. 
 Posts: 386 |
Posted by: finnishguy on the 14th 2006f May @ 09:19 |
|
| just wanted to inform that the research done by "poplar mechanics" hasnt been done according to scientifical methods. When you do a scientific study, you cant assume anything from the start, like they are doing. Bad paper. |

anameric.. 
 Posts: 52 |
Posted by: anamerican on the 28th 2006f May @ 04:00 |
|
Watch the discovery channel you fucking idiots
And what was the ten minute theory on a plane load of jet fuel? Watch a small jet crash on an aircraft carrier and see how long it burns and what temperatures it creates.
 |

Fulgore 
 Posts: 660 |
Posted by: Fulgore on the 28th 2006f May @ 04:50 |
|
| Quote: | On 13-03-06 08:53 Funbags wrote:
[..]
I would give the alien theorists more creedence than the Bush planned 9/11 followers. |
Wheres the plane wreckage then? And why all the videos of the crash confiscated? If there was nothing to hide and things happened as they tell us, why hide everything. If anything surely these videos would only convince us more that it was al queda?
Wake up and smell the coffee you moron, the day an atlantic jet crashing into a building only leaves a 20ft hole and no wreakage is the day i have a 6ft penis  |

RobYDMfa.. 
 Posts: 2374 |
Posted by: RobYDMfan on the 25th 2006f Jun @ 12:46 |
|
So are you going to believe the guy that did Abuguraib, Guantanamo, Haditha and defends torture? and that is funded by Saudis ? and is
taping your phone lines ? breaking the LAW?
and did we find Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq .... no
on thing i can say is that WTC towers had people in them when they fell and so did Iraq. |

meihxx_m.. 
 Posts: 215 |
Posted by: meihxx_mjl on the 14th 2008f Jul @ 19:01 |
|
| i cant watch the video for sum reason the link is dud |


|
|