|
|
The guy jumps out of the pitch to catch the ball. Does that count?
 
Posted by: Scottjpw on the 03rd 2008f March 2008 | Comments: (27) | 
boyjohn 
Posts: 4444 |
Posted by: boyjohn on the 03rd 2008f Mar @ 09:54 |
  |
Great play!  |
keeper
Posts: 5 |
Posted by: keeper on the 03rd 2008f Mar @ 10:31 |
|
Catch doesn't count though. He threw the ball back in from outside the field of play. If he had carried it back into the field and then thrown it back into the infield, the out would've stood.
Dumb Ump! |
Cocleari..
Posts: 1349 |
Posted by: Coclearium on the 03rd 2008f Mar @ 11:38 |
|
| seems like a lot of effort for what seems to just be batting practice.. |
Alacrity
Posts: 3776 |
Posted by: Alacrity on the 03rd 2008f Mar @ 12:12 |
|
| YAWN! |
Tyrfingr
Posts: 9901 |
Posted by: Tyrfingr on the 03rd 2008f Mar @ 13:09 |
 |
 *silent yawn* |
Bullit
Posts: 1957 |
Posted by: Bullit on the 03rd 2008f Mar @ 13:54 |
|
| Quote: | On 03-03-08 15:54 boyjohn wrote:
Great play! |
How can it be great play for you ? This is not a gay sport, you didlo bitch !
Nitting is a proper occupation for you, retarded queer !
ps: va succhiare come il cammello da tu è ... |
lstrex
Posts: 6102 |
Posted by: lstrex on the 03rd 2008f Mar @ 14:22 |
|
| Quote: | On 03-03-08 19:09 Tyrfingr wrote:
*silent yawn*
|
scott can u post some hockey clips i want to bitch at that in response
p.s baseball is boring but no one says FOOTBALL IS BORING!!!!! |
boyjohn
Posts: 4444 |
Posted by: boyjohn on the 03rd 2008f Mar @ 14:51 |
|
| Quote: | On 03-03-08 19:54 Bullit wrote:
[..]
How can it be great play for you ? This is not a gay sport, you didlo bitch !
Nitting is a proper occupation for you, retarded queer !
ps: va succhiare come il cammello da tu è ... |
Bulitgirl you are living proof that man fucked monkeys. |
Bullit
Posts: 1957 |
Posted by: Bullit on the 03rd 2008f Mar @ 15:06 |
|
| Quote: | On 03-03-08 20:51 boyjohn wrote:
[..]
Bulitgirl you are living proof that man fucked monkeys.
|
Telling us your fond memories from your last trip in Congo, that's how you cought the Ebola virus & pretty soon and you'll fucking die from it ! Fucking flaming queer ! |
boyjohn
Posts: 4444 |
Posted by: boyjohn on the 03rd 2008f Mar @ 15:24 |
|
| Quote: | On 03-03-08 21:06 Bullit wrote:
[..]
Telling us your fond memories from your last trip in Congo, that's how you cought the Ebola virus & pretty soon and you'll fucking die from it ! Fucking flaming queer ! |
wogga wogga |
kingkhal..
Posts: 554 |
Posted by: kingkhalsa on the 03rd 2008f Mar @ 18:09 |
|
Baseball-waste of time.....
Oh and Bullshit you're a knobhead!!!  |
boyjohn
Posts: 4444 |
Posted by: boyjohn on the 03rd 2008f Mar @ 19:15 |
|
| Quote: | On 04-03-08 00:09 kingkhalsa wrote:
Oh and Bullshit you're a knobhead!!! |
|
Tyrfingr
Posts: 9901 |
Posted by: Tyrfingr on the 03rd 2008f Mar @ 21:34 |
|
| Quote: | On 03-03-08 20:22 lstrex wrote:
[..]
scott can u post some hockey clips i want to bitch at that in response
|
Help. |
Chobits
Posts: 1863 |
Posted by: Chobits on the 03rd 2008f Mar @ 22:42 |
|
| Chi? |
Plumit20..
Posts: 680 |
Posted by: Plumit2000 on the 04th 2008f Mar @ 03:53 |
|
| Quote: | On 03-03-08 19:54 Bullit wrote:
[..]
How can it be great play for you ? This is not a gay sport, you didlo bitch !
Nitting is a proper occupation for you, retarded queer !
ps: va succhiare come il cammello da tu è ... |
thats it. i cant help but bag you out from now on. i tried not to. i tried to stop. but every post you are telling someone they are gay. i believe you are the one that is gay. you wont drop the whole gay subject. its so childish. who gets offended being called gay when they are not. its like calling the orange a tomato. but watch this.
YOU ARE GAY!!!
now you will get all upity in my grill about what i just said.
thus proving you are gay. |
Bullit
Posts: 1957 |
Posted by: Bullit on the 04th 2008f Mar @ 05:17 |
|
| Quote: | On 04-03-08 09:53 Plumit2000 wrote:
[..]
thats it. i cant help but bag you out from now on. i tried not to. i tried to stop. but every post you are telling someone they are gay. i believe you are the one that is gay. you wont drop the whole gay subject. its so childish. who gets offended being called gay when they are not. its like calling the orange a tomato. but watch this.
YOU ARE GAY!!!
now you will get all upity in my grill about what i just said.
thus proving you are gay. |
So, you're standing up for boyjohn; that makes another homo prick ! WTF with this site ? Is this the gay reunion ?
From your lack of judgement & intelligence, I'll treat you as homoboy. FYI, HE IS truly homosexual ! It's not a fucking insult, it's a FACT, you moron ! Or maybe you are one too which will spare me some time to prove who you really are.
But remember asshole, You started this shit and I'll finish it !
IF I WAS what you desperately stating in vain, I wouldn't be here you fucking prick ! I'd be in an appropriate site, you fucking idiot ! You wanna play the chinky bitch with me, c'mon bring it on asshole, bring it on !
Why don't you take your little plane and treat yourself for a trip to San Fransisco, they'll be delighted to welcome you !
I've warned you dickhead ! |
Plumit20..
Posts: 680 |
Posted by: Plumit2000 on the 04th 2008f Mar @ 05:54 |
|
^^^
|
Bullit
Posts: 1957 |
Posted by: Bullit on the 04th 2008f Mar @ 06:36 |
|
| Quote: | On 04-03-08 11:54 Plumit2000 wrote:
^^^
|
You are a fool ! |
boyjohn
Posts: 4444 |
Posted by: boyjohn on the 04th 2008f Mar @ 12:35 |
|
| Quote: | On 04-03-08 11:17 Bullit wrote:
[..]
So, you're standing up for boyjohn; that makes another homo prick ! WTF with this site ? Is this the gay reunion ?
From your lack of judgement & intelligence, I'll treat you as homoboy. FYI, HE IS truly homosexual ! It's not a fucking insult, it's a FACT, you moron ! Or maybe you are one too which will spare me some time to prove who you really are.
But remember asshole, You started this shit and I'll finish it !
IF I WAS what you desperately stating in vain, I wouldn't be here you fucking prick ! I'd be in an appropriate site, you fucking idiot ! You wanna play the chinky bitch with me, c'mon bring it on asshole, bring it on !
Why don't you take your little plane and treat yourself for a trip to San Fransisco, they'll be delighted to welcome you !
I've warned you dickhead !
|
Bulitgirl you are so gay that a clutch purse falls out of your mouth when you speak. |
boyjohn
Posts: 4444 |
Posted by: boyjohn on the 04th 2008f Mar @ 18:49 |
|
| Quote: | On 04-03-08 18:35 boyjohn wrote:
[..]
Bulitgirl you are so gay that a clutch purse falls out of your mouth when you speak. |
|
niga_pun
Posts: 1109 |
Posted by: niga_pun on the 04th 2008f Mar @ 19:39 |
|
Necrophilia was practiced in some ancient cultures as a spiritual means of communicating with the dead, while others employed it as an attempt to revive the recently departed. The evidence of necrophilia practices can be found in the artifacts of the Moche civilization of South America, where pottery depicting skeletal figures engaged in coitus with living humans are among the ruins.[citation needed] Even in ancient Egypt, there is record of the treatment of the bodies of young women that were set out to rot for a few days before being delivered to embalmers. This practice was born from the need to discourage the men performing the funerary customs from having sexual interest in their charges. Herodotus writes[3] in The Histories that, to discourage intercourse with a corpse, Ancient Egyptians left deceased beautiful women to decay for "three or four days" before giving them to the embalmers.[4][5]
Antiquity offers numerous examples of what may readily be described as cults of thanatophilia; perhaps the most famous of them being that of Alexander the Great's, which was physically centered around his breastplate, kept in a mausolean reliquary in the eponymous Egyptian city for over five hundred years. More remarkable still are accounts stating that Alexander's body was placed in a sarcophagus of solid gold and perfectly preserved in a (sterilizing) bath of honey through the remaining centuries of antiquity.
[edit] Research
In 1958, Klaf and Brown[5] commented that, although rarely described, necrophilic fantasies may occur more often than is generally supposed.
Rosman and Resnick[6] (1989) theorized that either of the following situations could be antecedents to necrophilia (pp. 161):
The necrophile develops poor self-esteem, perhaps due in part to a significant loss;
(a) He (usually male) is very fearful of rejection by women and he desires a sexual partner who is incapable of rejecting him; and/or
 He is fearful of the dead, and transforms his fear — by means of reaction formation — into a desire.
He develops an exciting fantasy of sex with a corpse, sometimes after exposure to a corpse.
The authors also reported that, of their sample of 'necrophiliacs,' 68 percent were motivated by a desire for an unresisting and unrejecting partner; 21 percent by a want for reunion with a lost partner; 15 percent by sexual attraction to dead people; 15 percent by a desire for comfort or to overcome feelings of isolation; and 12 percent by a desire to remedy low self-esteem by expressing power over a corpse (pp. 159).
At the end of their own report, Rosman and Resnick wrote that their study should only be used like a spring-board for further, more in depth, research.
Minor modern researches conducted in England have shown that some necrophiles tend to choose a dead mate after failing to create romantic attachments with the living[citation needed].
[edit] Character orientation in western society
For psychologist/philosopher Erich Fromm, necrophilia is a character orientation which is not necessarily sexual. It is expressed in an attraction to that which is dead or totally controlled. At the extreme, it results in destructiveness and a hatred of life.
For Fromm, necrophilia is the opposite of biophilia. Unlike Freud's death instinct, it is not biologically determined but results from upbringing. Fromm believed that the lack of love in the western society and the attraction to mechanistic control leads to necrophilia. Other factors include; the impact of modern weapon systems, idolotry of technology, and the treatment of people as things in bureaucracy.[7][8]
[edit] Animals
Main article: Davian behavior
Necrophilia is not unknown in animals, with a number of confirmed observations.[9] Kees Moeliker allegedly made one of these observations while he was sitting in his office at the Natuurmuseum Rotterdam, when he heard the distinctive thud of a bird hitting the glass facade of the building. Upon inspection, he discovered a drake mallard lying dead about two meters from the building. Next to the downed bird there was a second drake mallard standing close by. As he observed the couple, the living drake picked at the corpse of the dead one for a few minutes and then mounted the corpse and began copulating with it. The act of necrophilia lasted for about 75 minutes, in which time, according to Moeliker, the living drake took two short breaks before resuming with copulating behavior. Moeliker surmised that at the time of the collision with the window the two mallards were engaged in a common motif in duck behavior which is called rape flight. "When one died the other one just went for it and didn't get any negative feedback -- well, didn't get any feedback," according to Moeliker.[10][11] This is the first recorded case of necrophilia in the mallard duck- though not the only recorded case of homosexuality within the bird family.[12]
In the case of a praying mantis, necrophilia could be said to be part of their methods of reproduction. The larger female will often decapitate or even eat her mate during copulation.[13]
[edit] Legality
[edit] Consensuality issue
Although obtaining consent is not usually considered a prerequisite for activity with non-living material, sexual activity with a human corpse is considered to be taboo[1] and frequently labelled as abuse to the deceased persons, based on the presumption that the person would not have consented to the act while alive, and that it would thus constitute a profound disrespect for their remains to be treated in a way other than their assumed wishes.
Although virtually all human societies condemn sexual activity with the dead as a form of symbolic disrespect, several groups, individuals, and publications have pushed for the legalization of necrophilic acts. "The NecroErotic," for example, argues that "necrophiliacs have as much right to engage in their orgasmic release of choice as do 'normal' [living] couples," and that "all 'rights' cease the moment a person draws his or her last breath."[citation needed]
[edit] Status
[edit] India
Section 297 of Indian Penal Code (IPC) entitled "Trespassing on burial places, etc", states as follows:[14]
Whoever, with the intention of wounding the feelings of any person, or of insulting the religion of any person, or with the knowledge that the feelings of any person are likely to be wounded, or that the religion of any person is likely to be insulted thereby, commits any trespass in any place of worship or on any place of sculpture, or any place set apart from the performance of funeral rites or as a depository for the remains of the dead, or offers any indignity to any human corpse, or causes disturbance to any persons assembled for the performance of funeral ceremonies, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine, or with both.
Although Necrophilia is not explicitly stated in IPC, a necrophiliac may be convicted under the above section in the Indian Penal Code. There have been several allegations by relatives of dead women, that the dead bodies of their kin were defiled in the night by mortuary attendants, but none have been proved. The possibility of such an act taking place on a regular basis is not impossible to imagine.
In some cases, where a woman was allegedn to have been raped and murdered and the autopsy surgeon failed to find any signs of rape, the relatives have approached the authorities for a second postmortem. The second postmortem is invariably conducted at a different hospital, often necessitating the deposit of the body overnight at the mortuary of the second hospital. In cases, where the second autopsy surgeon finds signs of rape, the defendants have been known to allege that the dead body was defiled by drunk mortuary attendants at night. None of such allegations have been proved in a court of law, however.
[edit] United Kingdom
Sexual penetration with a corpse was made illegal under the Sexual Offences Act 2003. The Government is also considering criminalising possession of depictions of necrophilia. This is defined as depictions of "sexual interference with a human corpse" (as opposed to only penetration), and would cover "depictions which appear to be real acts" as well as actual scenes (see also extreme pornography). |
boyjohn
Posts: 4444 |
Posted by: boyjohn on the 04th 2008f Mar @ 20:10 |
|
| Quote: | On 05-03-08 01:39 niga_pun wrote:
Necrophilia was practiced in some ancient cultures as a spiritual means of communicating with the dead, while others employed it as an attempt to revive the recently departed. The evidence of necrophilia practices can be found in the artifacts of the Moche civilization of South America, where pottery depicting skeletal figures engaged in coitus with living humans are among the ruins.[citation needed] Even in ancient Egypt, there is record of the treatment of the bodies of young women that were set out to rot for a few days before being delivered to embalmers. This practice was born from the need to discourage the men performing the funerary customs from having sexual interest in their charges. Herodotus writes[3] in The Histories that, to discourage intercourse with a corpse, Ancient Egyptians left deceased beautiful women to decay for "three or four days" before giving them to the embalmers.[4][5]
Antiquity offers numerous examples of what may readily be described as cults of thanatophilia; perhaps the most famous of them being that of Alexander the Great's, which was physically centered around his breastplate, kept in a mausolean reliquary in the eponymous Egyptian city for over five hundred years. More remarkable still are accounts stating that Alexander's body was placed in a sarcophagus of solid gold and perfectly preserved in a (sterilizing) bath of honey through the remaining centuries of antiquity.
[edit] Research
In 1958, Klaf and Brown[5] commented that, although rarely described, necrophilic fantasies may occur more often than is generally supposed.
Rosman and Resnick[6] (1989) theorized that either of the following situations could be antecedents to necrophilia (pp. 161):
The necrophile develops poor self-esteem, perhaps due in part to a significant loss;
(a) He (usually male) is very fearful of rejection by women and he desires a sexual partner who is incapable of rejecting him; and/or
He is fearful of the dead, and transforms his fear — by means of reaction formation — into a desire.
He develops an exciting fantasy of sex with a corpse, sometimes after exposure to a corpse.
The authors also reported that, of their sample of 'necrophiliacs,' 68 percent were motivated by a desire for an unresisting and unrejecting partner; 21 percent by a want for reunion with a lost partner; 15 percent by sexual attraction to dead people; 15 percent by a desire for comfort or to overcome feelings of isolation; and 12 percent by a desire to remedy low self-esteem by expressing power over a corpse (pp. 159).
At the end of their own report, Rosman and Resnick wrote that their study should only be used like a spring-board for further, more in depth, research.
Minor modern researches conducted in England have shown that some necrophiles tend to choose a dead mate after failing to create romantic attachments with the living[citation needed].
[edit] Character orientation in western society
For psychologist/philosopher Erich Fromm, necrophilia is a character orientation which is not necessarily sexual. It is expressed in an attraction to that which is dead or totally controlled. At the extreme, it results in destructiveness and a hatred of life.
For Fromm, necrophilia is the opposite of biophilia. Unlike Freud's death instinct, it is not biologically determined but results from upbringing. Fromm believed that the lack of love in the western society and the attraction to mechanistic control leads to necrophilia. Other factors include; the impact of modern weapon systems, idolotry of technology, and the treatment of people as things in bureaucracy.[7][8]
[edit] Animals
Main article: Davian behavior
Necrophilia is not unknown in animals, with a number of confirmed observations.[9] Kees Moeliker allegedly made one of these observations while he was sitting in his office at the Natuurmuseum Rotterdam, when he heard the distinctive thud of a bird hitting the glass facade of the building. Upon inspection, he discovered a drake mallard lying dead about two meters from the building. Next to the downed bird there was a second drake mallard standing close by. As he observed the couple, the living drake picked at the corpse of the dead one for a few minutes and then mounted the corpse and began copulating with it. The act of necrophilia lasted for about 75 minutes, in which time, according to Moeliker, the living drake took two short breaks before resuming with copulating behavior. Moeliker surmised that at the time of the collision with the window the two mallards were engaged in a common motif in duck behavior which is called rape flight. "When one died the other one just went for it and didn't get any negative feedback -- well, didn't get any feedback," according to Moeliker.[10][11] This is the first recorded case of necrophilia in the mallard duck- though not the only recorded case of homosexuality within the bird family.[12]
In the case of a praying mantis, necrophilia could be said to be part of their methods of reproduction. The larger female will often decapitate or even eat her mate during copulation.[13]
[edit] Legality
[edit] Consensuality issue
Although obtaining consent is not usually considered a prerequisite for activity with non-living material, sexual activity with a human corpse is considered to be taboo[1] and frequently labelled as abuse to the deceased persons, based on the presumption that the person would not have consented to the act while alive, and that it would thus constitute a profound disrespect for their remains to be treated in a way other than their assumed wishes.
Although virtually all human societies condemn sexual activity with the dead as a form of symbolic disrespect, several groups, individuals, and publications have pushed for the legalization of necrophilic acts. "The NecroErotic," for example, argues that "necrophiliacs have as much right to engage in their orgasmic release of choice as do 'normal' [living] couples," and that "all 'rights' cease the moment a person draws his or her last breath."[citation needed]
[edit] Status
[edit] India
Section 297 of Indian Penal Code (IPC) entitled "Trespassing on burial places, etc", states as follows:[14]
Whoever, with the intention of wounding the feelings of any person, or of insulting the religion of any person, or with the knowledge that the feelings of any person are likely to be wounded, or that the religion of any person is likely to be insulted thereby, commits any trespass in any place of worship or on any place of sculpture, or any place set apart from the performance of funeral rites or as a depository for the remains of the dead, or offers any indignity to any human corpse, or causes disturbance to any persons assembled for the performance of funeral ceremonies, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine, or with both.
Although Necrophilia is not explicitly stated in IPC, a necrophiliac may be convicted under the above section in the Indian Penal Code. There have been several allegations by relatives of dead women, that the dead bodies of their kin were defiled in the night by mortuary attendants, but none have been proved. The possibility of such an act taking place on a regular basis is not impossible to imagine.
In some cases, where a woman was allegedn to have been raped and murdered and the autopsy surgeon failed to find any signs of rape, the relatives have approached the authorities for a second postmortem. The second postmortem is invariably conducted at a different hospital, often necessitating the deposit of the body overnight at the mortuary of the second hospital. In cases, where the second autopsy surgeon finds signs of rape, the defendants have been known to allege that the dead body was defiled by drunk mortuary attendants at night. None of such allegations have been proved in a court of law, however.
[edit] United Kingdom
Sexual penetration with a corpse was made illegal under the Sexual Offences Act 2003. The Government is also considering criminalising possession of depictions of necrophilia. This is defined as depictions of "sexual interference with a human corpse" (as opposed to only penetration), and would cover "depictions which appear to be real acts" as well as actual scenes (see also extreme pornography).
|
Great post! Can you make a copy in French for bulitgirl |
Bullit
Posts: 1957 |
Posted by: Bullit on the 05th 2008f Mar @ 05:25 |
|
| Quote: | On 05-03-08 01:39 niga_pun wrote:
.......
|
 I guess that makes you the smartest guy in the US Army ! |
niga_pun
Posts: 1109 |
Posted by: niga_pun on the 05th 2008f Mar @ 19:00 |
|
| Quote: | On 05-03-08 11:25 Bullit wrote:
[..]
I guess that makes you the smartest guy in the US Army ! |
THE AIRFORCE, U FAGGOT, AND NO U DONT GET A COOKIE FOR KEEPING UP WITH WHAT YDM MEMBERS SAY  |
H_TOWN_M..
Posts: 6278 |
Posted by: H_TOWN_MEX on the 05th 2008f Mar @ 19:57 |
|
FACK YOUR MONKEY ASS
|
niga_pun
Posts: 1109 |
Posted by: niga_pun on the 05th 2008f Mar @ 21:29 |
|
| Quote: | On 06-03-08 01:57 H_TOWN_MEX wrote:
FACK YOUR MONKEY ASS
|
talk to boyjohn |
lstrex
Posts: 6102 |
Posted by: lstrex on the 08th 2008f Mar @ 15:36 |
|
| Quote: | On 04-03-08 03:34 Tyrfingr wrote:
[..]
Help. |
was that meant to be sarcasm its just its hard to tell in text
and ur sarcasm waves dont quite reach these isles |
|
|
Movies 7904
Pictures 2096
Games 290
Animations 135
Links 474
Other 80
Music 83
