|
|
badkarma 
Posts: 56 |
Posted by: badkarma on the 09th 2008f Apr @ 08:15 |
  |
| russian bastards |
jelleoel..
Posts: 1658 |
Posted by: jelleoelle on the 09th 2008f Apr @ 08:35 |
|
Oh c'mon, that is so obviosly FAKE. It's a human in a bear suit!
1 - Those are regular human sized and regular shaped skates. Why would they fit a bear?
2 - A bear has paws, not hands, and it would not be able to grab the stick like that. It would have to hold the same place on the stick, with both paws.
3 - Look at how it skates, and make turns, twisting it's feet in opposite directions. A bear cannot do that! |
lstrex
Posts: 6102 |
Posted by: lstrex on the 09th 2008f Apr @ 08:40 |
 |
| Quote: | On 09-04-08 05:35 jelleoelle wrote:
Oh c'mon, that is so obviosly FAKE. It's a human in a bear suit!
1 - Those are regular human sized and regular shaped skates. Why would they fit a bear?
2 - A bear has paws, not hands, and it would not be able to grab the stick like that. It would have to hold the same place on the stick, with both paws.
3 - Look at how it skates, and make turns, twisting it's feet in opposite directions. A bear cannot do that!
|
 then thats a fucking realistic suit
GOONNNNERRRR WHERREE RR UUU???? |
Plumit20..
Posts: 680 |
Posted by: Plumit2000 on the 09th 2008f Apr @ 08:49 |
|
| Quote: | On 09-04-08 05:35 jelleoelle wrote:
Oh c'mon, that is so obviosly FAKE. It's a human in a bear suit!
1 - Those are regular human sized and regular shaped skates. Why would they fit a bear?
2 - A bear has paws, not hands, and it would not be able to grab the stick like that. It would have to hold the same place on the stick, with both paws.
3 - Look at how it skates, and make turns, twisting it's feet in opposite directions. A bear cannot do that!
|
i agree. although it could pass for real. its too ridiculous for me to contemplate a bear skating and scoring a goal right now.
it would take far too long for the bear to develop the co-ordination. it cannot walk on its hind legs like we can how am i to fucking believe it could skate.
JESUS SOMEONE PLEASE CONFIRM THIS IS FAKE!!! |
jelleoel..
Posts: 1658 |
Posted by: jelleoelle on the 09th 2008f Apr @ 09:45 |
|
Also just looking at the HANDS, gives it away totally by itself.
Those are obviously regular human hands inside a costume, holding the stick. |
a_scisso..
Posts: 296 |
Posted by: a_scissors on the 09th 2008f Apr @ 11:48 |
|
its real. Russian circus bears are a bit different than the stocky grizzly or brown bear. (google russian circus bear) And they are quite flexible. It's still fucking cruel though. Totally stripping that bear's natural dignity and making him a humiliating exploit. Bogus.  |
mcmartin..
Posts: 1436 |
Posted by: mcmartin27 on the 09th 2008f Apr @ 12:57 |
|
Real or not I was let down!
I really wanted to see the bear just maul the fuck out of both of them!  |
CopyCat
Posts: 6306 |
Posted by: CopyCat on the 09th 2008f Apr @ 13:35 |
|
Real or not I was let down!
I really wanted to see some cat shit, fireworks
and tities... |
mcmartin..
Posts: 1436 |
Posted by: mcmartin27 on the 09th 2008f Apr @ 13:48 |
|
| ^^^ LOL!!!! |
Filthgri..
Posts: 461 |
Posted by: Filthgrinder on the 09th 2008f Apr @ 14:04 |
|
| ^^^ crusty, brown rings are my favorite. |
Bullit
Posts: 1957 |
Posted by: Bullit on the 09th 2008f Apr @ 14:26 |
|
| Quote: | On 09-04-08 05:49 Plumit2000 wrote:
[..]
JESUS SOMEONE PLEASE CONFIRM THIS IS FAKE!!! |
Taking the Lord's name in vain should bring you some bad ass luck for quite some time !
Way to go asshole ! |
finnishg..
Posts: 386 |
Posted by: finnishguy on the 09th 2008f Apr @ 14:57 |
|
| Quote: | On 09-04-08 11:26 Bullit wrote:
[..]
Taking the Lord's name in vain should bring you some bad ass luck for quite some time !
Way to go asshole !
|
yeah right... |
jelleoel..
Posts: 1658 |
Posted by: jelleoelle on the 09th 2008f Apr @ 15:27 |
|
| Quote: | On 09-04-08 11:26 Bullit wrote:
[..]
Taking the Lord's name in vain should bring you some bad ass luck for quite some time !
Way to go asshole !
|
What lord? Jesus was a dumb fuck who was stupid enough to get executed for nothing. |
Bullit
Posts: 1957 |
Posted by: Bullit on the 09th 2008f Apr @ 15:54 |
|
| Quote: | On 09-04-08 12:27 jelleoelle wrote:
[..]
What lord? Jesus was a dumb fuck who was stupid enough to get executed for nothing. |
Dat is niet goed ketje ! |
Alacrity
Posts: 3777 |
Posted by: Alacrity on the 09th 2008f Apr @ 16:01 |
|
| Quote: | On 09-04-08 08:48 a_scissors wrote:
its real. Russian circus bears are a bit different than the stocky grizzly or brown bear. (google russian circus bear) And they are quite flexible. It's still fucking cruel though. Totally stripping that bear's natural dignity and making him a humiliating exploit. Bogus. |
OMG! A humiliated and exploited bear. LOL  |
lstrex
Posts: 6102 |
Posted by: lstrex on the 09th 2008f Apr @ 16:53 |
|
| Quote: | On 09-04-08 12:54 Bullit wrote:
[..]
jesus is a figment of my imagination |
at last u were to old to have imaginary friends |
boyjohn
Posts: 4444 |
Posted by: boyjohn on the 09th 2008f Apr @ 16:55 |
|
Nice!  |
lstrex
Posts: 6102 |
Posted by: lstrex on the 09th 2008f Apr @ 17:14 |
|
| Quote: | On 09-04-08 11:26 Bullit wrote:
[..]
Taking the Lord's name in vain should bring you some bad ass luck for quite some time !
|
according to the bible the planet is only 6,000 years old
explain dinosaurs bullshit, explain dinosaurs |
Bullit
Posts: 1957 |
Posted by: Bullit on the 09th 2008f Apr @ 17:58 |
|
| Quote: | On 09-04-08 14:14 lstrex wrote:
[..]
according to the bible the planet is only 6,000 years old
explain dinosaurs bullshit, explain dinosaurs
|
Shitty Istrex; who gives a fuck about the dinosaurs ? I mean, they have no importance in the history of mankind. They were just passing by for a little while, eating grass & taking shits & got vanished under the meteorites, end of story !
The bible is not a history book about planet Earth & the dinosaurs & the wankers like you who came after that !
The bible is about faith in God & in his Holy Son, Jesus-Christ. You either believe in Them or not. That's it.
Preferably with respect. |
mcmartin..
Posts: 1436 |
Posted by: mcmartin27 on the 09th 2008f Apr @ 18:05 |
|
How'd we go from MANBEARPIG playing hockey to Dinosaurs and Jesus?
Istrex, is that "Who You Gonna Call, Jesus Busters" or "Say No To Jesus," just asking? |
lstrex
Posts: 6102 |
Posted by: lstrex on the 09th 2008f Apr @ 18:32 |
|
| Quote: | On 09-04-08 14:58 Bullit wrote:
[..]
Shitty Istrex; who gives a fuck about the dinosaurs ? I mean, they have no importance in the history of mankind. They were just passing by for a little while, eating grass & taking shits & got vanished under the meteorites, end of story !
The bible is not a history book about planet Earth & the dinosaurs & the wankers like you who came after that !
The bible is about faith in God & in his Holy Son, Jesus-Christ. You either believe in Them or not. That's it.
Preferably with respect.
|
so ur saying the bible isnt ture?
and its a ghost busters kind of thing mc found it on google |
mcmartin..
Posts: 1436 |
Posted by: mcmartin27 on the 09th 2008f Apr @ 18:42 |
|
| Quote: | On 09-04-08 15:32 lstrex wrote:
[..]
and its a ghost busters kind of thing mc found it on google |
Nice... I can hear the music, "da daa da daa da, da da daa da! There's something stange, in the neighborhood, who you gonna call, Jesus Busters!"   |
lstrex
Posts: 6102 |
Posted by: lstrex on the 09th 2008f Apr @ 20:18 |
|
|
Chobits
Posts: 1863 |
Posted by: Chobits on the 10th 2008f Apr @ 00:29 |
|
| Chi? |
Alacrity
Posts: 3777 |
Posted by: Alacrity on the 10th 2008f Apr @ 01:18 |
|
| Quote: | On 09-04-08 14:14 lstrex wrote:
[..]
according to the bible the planet is only 6,000 years old
explain dinosaurs bullshit, explain dinosaurs
|
I really don't understand what you want explained as the word dinosaur was not even invented until 1842 by English paleontologist Richard Owen. Before then they referred to them as dragons, leviathan, behemoth, and other names that escape me. The KJV bible does do a very credible job of describing them in several places with an accuracy that would have required an eye witness.
 |
Filthgri..
Posts: 461 |
Posted by: Filthgrinder on the 10th 2008f Apr @ 06:21 |
|
| Quote: | On 09-04-08 22:18 Alacrity wrote:
[..]
I really don't understand what you want explained as the word dinosaur was not even invented until 1842 by English paleontologist Richard Owen. Before then they referred to them as dragons, leviathan, behemoth, and other names that escape me. The KJV bible does do a very credible job of describing them in several places with an accuracy that would have required an eye witness.
|
jezus ...
mankind was not around when the dinosaurs ruled the earth, ignorant silly-billy. They got extinct 65 million years ago, dumbass.
And the bible is so self-contradictory that, in my mind, it cannot be the word of an allmighty, allknowing, allpowerful deity.
But luckily we are free to believe whatever we please, most places in the world. |
Alacrity
Posts: 3777 |
Posted by: Alacrity on the 10th 2008f Apr @ 09:18 |
|
Sorry, I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist.  |
jelleoel..
Posts: 1658 |
Posted by: jelleoelle on the 10th 2008f Apr @ 10:23 |
|
Religion brings nothing but bad things.
All religious people are either religious, because they were brought up to be so, or because they had psychological problems, like depression, and couldn't deal with the real world, and now live in the fantasy, denying facts right in front of them.
Religion = ignorance, hate, discrimination, war, etc.
Religious people are not good people. They only behave well and do good things, because they are afraid of going to hell if they don't.
The rest of us behave well because we want to, even though no religion forces us to do so. |
Alacrity
Posts: 3777 |
Posted by: Alacrity on the 10th 2008f Apr @ 12:10 |
|
| Quote: | On 10-04-08 07:23 jelleoelle wrote:
Religion brings nothing but bad things.
All religious people are either religious, because they were brought up to be so, or because they had psychological problems, like depression, and couldn't deal with the real world, and now live in the fantasy, denying facts right in front of them.
Religion = ignorance, hate, discrimination, war, etc.
Religious people are not good people. They only behave well and do good things, because they are afraid of going to hell if they don't.
The rest of us behave well because we want to, even though no religion forces us to do so. |
You keep up the blind faith as you have been taught and keep believing that. As Einstein said: “Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe.”
The proofs for Intelligent design surround you. It is more of a fairy tale to believe that the complex world we live in came from an explosion than it is to believe it was created by God. Of course, I'll be glad to change my belief just as soon as I see a tornado build a house out of the trees it blows down." |
jelleoel..
Posts: 1658 |
Posted by: jelleoelle on the 10th 2008f Apr @ 13:14 |
|
| Quote: | On 10-04-08 09:10 Alacrity wrote:
[..]
You keep up the blind faith as you have been taught and keep believing that. As Einstein said: “Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe.”
The proofs for Intelligent design surround you. It is more of a fairy tale to believe that the complex world we live in came from an explosion than it is to believe it was created by God. Of course, I'll be glad to change my belief just as soon as I see a tornado build a house out of the trees it blows down." |
Blind faith? C'mon.
And please don't start talking about intelligent design. That is the most unintelligent "theory" ever!
As ALWAYS the people who try to argue against evolution, turn out to just completely have misunderstood it, like you just showed a fine example of.
You just showed ignorance and complete lack of education of any kind, when you come with crap like that. |
mcmartin..
Posts: 1436 |
Posted by: mcmartin27 on the 10th 2008f Apr @ 18:07 |
|
| Just because you can't prove God scientifically doesn't mean there isn't one. On the flip side, religions like the Christians and Muslims have all been highjacked by people with greed and ambition, that's why they are the most dominant in the world, not because they are better or more correct than the peaceful ones. Religion doesn't create war, we do, and if people wish to believe in something great, maybe it keeps them from being bums, who cares, give respect and you should get it back, if you don't... kill some ass! Do unto others as you have them do unto you, unless they are doing unto you what didn't do unto them! Cheers |
Alacrity
Posts: 3777 |
Posted by: Alacrity on the 10th 2008f Apr @ 18:25 |
|
| Quote: | On 10-04-08 10:14 jelleoelle wrote:
[..]
Blind faith? C'mon.
And please don't start talking about intelligent design. That is the most unintelligent "theory" ever!
As ALWAYS the people who try to argue against evolution, turn out to just completely have misunderstood it, like you just showed a fine example of.
You just showed ignorance and complete lack of education of any kind, when you come with crap like that. |
Are you really so sure I don't understand Darwinism? Or is it that I understand it too well?
Darwin in his writings said that if certain criteria were not met his theory would be false. Well guess what, that criteria was never met therefore according to the man who put forth the theory of evolution it is invalid. The problem with science now a days is that the "scientist" goes in with a preconceived notion and only accepts those things that will further his beliefs and agenda. A real scientist will look at the facts and take him to where ever they lead. In the creation/evolution debate they take you in the opposite direction of evolution if you only follow the science and ignore your presuppositions. One example, for evolution to be valid it needs billions of years. It is a fact that the sun is shrinking at a definite rate and has been consistent ever since the technology existed to measure it. If you crunch the numbers you find that about 10 million years ago the sun would have engulfed the earth. The moon has been moving away from the earth at a steady rate and less than two million years ago would have been skimming the treetops. Can you imagine the incredible tides roaring across land around the world like enormous tidal waves. Pretty hard for ANYTHING to live under those circumstances. There are a myriad of other evidences that are reproducible by anybody and tell you that an old earth is IMPOSSIBLE. In order to see that though you must ignore your opinions and look at the science.
~~~ 73 & God Bless ~ >",)Bob>< ~~With Alacrity~~~
|
mcmartin..
Posts: 1436 |
Posted by: mcmartin27 on the 10th 2008f Apr @ 18:33 |
|
| ^^^ Your science facts are badly mistated! Not siding with anyone here, just saying, check your facts before you post them. |
lstrex
Posts: 6102 |
Posted by: lstrex on the 10th 2008f Apr @ 18:48 |
|
the moon hit us and has been slowly getting further away from us there was a long time between it hitting us and life evolving
answer the simple question 6009 years ago when stonehenge was in mid construction god then put adam and eve on the planet (meaning we are all inbred) and while he was there he buried dinosaurs and aged there bones on purpose he created other religions so he could send their followers all to hell he never liked aborigines so he could send them to hell as they didnt have the never introduced christianity to them so they would all go to hell etc.etc, etc |
mcmartin..
Posts: 1436 |
Posted by: mcmartin27 on the 10th 2008f Apr @ 19:04 |
|
No one like that aborigines, not even the aborigines! Oh, snap!
Question: If God is perfect, would he be bound by laws? I mean, he can't say and not do right? So, what if God created the universe right... um whenever... and then was like Cartman, Oh, I do what I want? Wouldn't he then cease to exist?
Point is, there just might be, just might, be this little slight chance that God utilizes science to bring about his very secret and vague agenda. I would bet that such has a better chance of being true than God alone. Whatever the case religion doesn’t seem to change, science does, but before it does its very scrutinized and studied, not from someone whittles child molesting hypocrite! If God sends everyone to hell for not believing, then God can kiss my ass and I’ll have a drink with abo’s in hell cuz we all know they love to drink. I wouldn’t want to be around near, or caught siding with a Jackass!!! So whose god is real? How about we just wait and find out. MMM-K!
Also, Um… there is still no explanation for the existence of MANBEARPIG! Explain that one people! |
jelleoel..
Posts: 1658 |
Posted by: jelleoelle on the 10th 2008f Apr @ 19:55 |
|
| Quote: | On 10-04-08 15:25 Alacrity wrote:
[..]
Are you really so sure I don't understand Darwinism? Or is it that I understand it too well?
Darwin in his writings said that if certain criteria were not met his theory would be false. Well guess what, that criteria was never met therefore according to the man who put forth the theory of evolution it is invalid. The problem with science now a days is that the "scientist" goes in with a preconceived notion and only accepts those things that will further his beliefs and agenda. A real scientist will look at the facts and take him to where ever they lead. In the creation/evolution debate they take you in the opposite direction of evolution if you only follow the science and ignore your presuppositions. One example, for evolution to be valid it needs billions of years. It is a fact that the sun is shrinking at a definite rate and has been consistent ever since the technology existed to measure it. If you crunch the numbers you find that about 10 million years ago the sun would have engulfed the earth. The moon has been moving away from the earth at a steady rate and less than two million years ago would have been skimming the treetops. Can you imagine the incredible tides roaring across land around the world like enormous tidal waves. Pretty hard for ANYTHING to live under those circumstances. There are a myriad of other evidences that are reproducible by anybody and tell you that an old earth is IMPOSSIBLE. In order to see that though you must ignore your opinions and look at the science.
~~~ 73 & God Bless ~ >",)Bob>< ~~With Alacrity~~~
|
Like I said, people like you who try to argue against evolution, have ALWAYS completely misunderstood both evolution and any kind of science in general. And you just proved that even furter! |
oggologg..
Posts: 8 |
Posted by: oggologgo on the 10th 2008f Apr @ 20:01 |
|
"Just because you can't prove God scientifically doesn't mean there isn't one."
Right, but there isn't one single thing to indicate that there might be one, so beleiving it is ridiculous! |
Alacrity
Posts: 3777 |
Posted by: Alacrity on the 10th 2008f Apr @ 23:32 |
|
| Quote: | On 10-04-08 16:55 jelleoelle wrote:
[..]
Like I said, people like you who try to argue against evolution, have ALWAYS completely misunderstood both evolution and any kind of science in general. And you just proved that even furter! |
Okay, I must have misunderstood Science Journal, one of the leading "scientific" advocates for Darwinism. According to them, man shares a common ancestor with the earthworm.
Is your great, great, great, great, great, grandaddy an earthworm?
The thought of crossbreeding worms and men boggles the mind.... OH WAIT, IS THAT WORM PREGNANT? You dumb bastard, did you forgot to use a condom?
|
jelleoel..
Posts: 1658 |
Posted by: jelleoelle on the 11th 2008f Apr @ 07:09 |
|
| Quote: | On 10-04-08 20:32 Alacrity wrote:
[..]
Okay, I must have misunderstood Science Journal, one of the leading "scientific" advocates for Darwinism. According to them, man shares a common ancestor with the earthworm.
Is your great, great, great, great, great, grandaddy an earthworm?
The thought of crossbreeding worms and men boggles the mind.... OH WAIT, IS THAT WORM PREGNANT? You dumb bastard, did you forgot to use a condom?
|
LOOOOOL - you refer to a popular science magazine! That explains how little you know.
YES, you have BOTH misunderstood science journal, AND you have misunderstood evolution.
And yet again you display your misunderstanding by a retarded argument like "The thought of crossbreeding worms and men boggles the mind.", just like proposing that a tornado building a house has anything to do with evolution.
Pure ignorance dude! And that's what come from religion! |
Alacrity
Posts: 3777 |
Posted by: Alacrity on the 11th 2008f Apr @ 17:05 |
|
| Quote: | On 11-04-08 04:09 jelleoelle wrote:
[..]
LOOOOOL - you refer to a popular science magazine! That explains how little you know.
YES, you have BOTH misunderstood science journal, AND you have misunderstood evolution.
And yet again you display your misunderstanding by a retarded argument like "The thought of crossbreeding worms and men boggles the mind.", just like proposing that a tornado building a house has anything to do with evolution.
Pure ignorance dude! And that's what come from religion! |
To start with I refer to Science Journal (I had the issue # & Pg # but I can no longer find it) NOT Popular Science.
EVOLUTION IS ENTIRELY FAITH BASED
Talk about faith, EVOLUTION is religious extremism, under the guise of science. Yet it defies science.
1) It violates the 1st law of thermodynamics.
2) It violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics.
3) It violates the law of cause and effect.
4) It violates the law of biogenesis.
5) The "big bang" violates the conservation of angular momentum, and others.
If somebody asks me do you believe in evolution? I say "Which one do you mean?" There are six meanings to the word. (A seventh actually which I won't discuss here except to name it as: Theological Evolution)
1) Are you talking about cosmic evolution? the origin of time space and matter, i.e. The Big Bang.
2) Chemical evolution the origin of higher elements from hydrogen. The "Big Bang" produced hydrogen and some helium, then where did the 105 other elements come from? Could life have formed in the "Primordial Soup" billions of years ago?
Evolutionists claim that simple chemicals became concentrated in ancient oceans, forming an organic broth which eventually produced living cells. Is this possible?
In 1953 Stanley Miller became famous for his experiment which produced amino acids by passing a spark through gasses which contained the elements that make up amino acids.
Evolutionists hoped their students would believe without question that amino acids would produce life. But, the amino acids produced would not work in any living things. The more recently suggested steps in "Chemical evolution" will not take place either. Besides that, they don't tell you that no life could exist within the poisonous tars produced at the same time. The idea is scientifically bankrupt, and the very foundation of evolutionary thinking is destroyed.
3) Stellar and planetary evolution: the origin of the stars and planets. No one has ever seen a star form. "The silent embarrassment of astrophysics today is we do not have even the slightest idea how even a single one of these stars managed to form." Martin Harwit,
Science 231,7 March 1986, P 1201-1202.
4) Organic evolution: The origin of life. No one has "HONESTLY" created any kind of life form. Even with a complete fresh dead body in front of them, no man has been able to breathe life into it. Believe it or not, Frankenstein is a myth.
5) Macro evolution: The evolution of one KIND into ANOTHER. (Nobody has ever seen a dog produce a non-dog) The dog the wolf and the coyote probably had a common ancestor, I wouldn't argue that. The same with various cats, horses, etc. However, Darwin wrote the Origin of SPECIES, not KINDS.
6) Micro evolution: VARIATIONS WITHIN KINDS. This is the only evolution that has been observed. The survival of the fittest etc.
THIS IS SCIENCE AND PROVABLE, while the first five definitions are strictly religious, beliefs, and not science.
HOWEVER; THE ONLY EVIDENCES OF EVOLUTION GIVEN ARE >>ALWAYS<< THIS ONE.
Evolutionists imply that this is somehow evidence for the other five. -DUH!
You're right, I'm just WAAAAAY too stupid to believe in Darwinist evolution.
|
jelleoel..
Posts: 1658 |
Posted by: jelleoelle on the 11th 2008f Apr @ 18:36 |
|
| Quote: | On 11-04-08 14:05 Alacrity wrote:
To start with I refer to Science Journal (I had the issue # & Pg # but I can no longer find it) NOT Popular Science."
|
Are you retarded?
Science Journal is A popular science magazine! DUH! That is what I wrote.
| Quote: | On 11-04-08 14:05 Alacrity wrote:
blah blah blah I am stupid blah blah...
1) It violates the 1st law of thermodynamics.
2) It violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics.
3) It violates the law of cause and effect.
4) It violates the law of biogenesis.
blah blah blah...
|
LOOOOL! Yet again you display your ignorance and complete misunderstanding of science.
| Quote: | On 11-04-08 14:05 Alacrity wrote:
Martin Harwit,
Science 231,7 March 1986,
|
Try reading something a bit newer. We know perfectly well how stars form. I happen to have a master in physics and astronomy, so give up and read a little actual science. |
Alacrity
Posts: 3777 |
Posted by: Alacrity on the 12th 2008f Apr @ 01:25 |
|
| Quote: | On 11-04-08 15:36 jelleoelle wrote:
[..]
Are you retarded?
Science Journal is A popular science magazine! DUH! That is what I wrote.
[..]
LOOOOL! Yet again you display your ignorance and complete misunderstanding of science.
[..]
Try reading something a bit newer. We know perfectly well how stars form. I happen to have a master in physics and astronomy, so give up and read a little actual science. |
WONDERFUL! Then as a self proclaimed 'expert' you will be able to give me AT LEAST one single undisputed example of evolution OTHER than micro evolution. Is that too much to ask? Pretty please?
If you have a masters degree in anything you are failing to live up to the standards for the Mickey Mouse school of liberal arts.
By your answers I get the impression that you are still struggling to finish "Shoe Laces For Dummies." All you have done SO FAR is criticize me and tell me how dumb I am. I'll take that back immediately when you give me AT LEAST one single undisputed example of evolution OTHER than micro evolution.
According to "modern science" this has happened billions of times so you should be able to swamp me with them. Live dangerously, give me two of them.
Since 1991, there has been an offer offer of $250,000 to anyone who can provide real scientific evidence that supports evolution. So far, no scientific evidence has been given. I'm so glad you Darwinist "scientists" are all so well off you don't need the extra cash.
>^,,^< >^,,^< >^,,^< >^,,^< >^,,^< >^,,^<
While you are at it, explain the following: If the combined DNA of the more than 10 TRILLION cells in the average human body are stretched out, they would would reach out for at least 20 BILLION km (12 BILLION mi.)... If the tiniest portion of a percentile of these PERFECT SEQUENCES are out of order, instead of a human body, you would be nothing more than a lifeless blob of jell. Yet SOMEHOW, you believe that this occurs quite ACCIDENTALLY throughout trillions of new LIFE forms DAILY; without a designer? HOW??????
I admire you friend. You have a truly blind faith that exceeds any Christian faith.  |
ccscary
Posts: 118 |
Posted by: ccscary on the 14th 2008f Apr @ 03:10 |
|
Scientific method FAILS to DISPROVE.
There is no such thing as proof unless you mean mathematics.
Alacrity is faking an inability to understand that the inability to understand isn't the basis for a logical argument.
God is a faggot. |
Alacrity
Posts: 3777 |
Posted by: Alacrity on the 14th 2008f Apr @ 17:37 |
|
| Quote: | On 14-04-08 00:10 ccscary wrote:
There is no such thing as proof unless you mean mathematics.
ccscary is a faggot. |
Your above statements are so pathetic I would have normally ignored them except for the fact that some clueless kid might come along and accept your benighted statement as having some basis in fact.
There ARE LAWS of science. They are called LAWS because they are observable and have been PROVEN time and again without any serious dispute. I say "serious" because there will always be benighted people like yourself that would still claim the earth was flat and resting on the back of a tortoise. (btw the bible said the earth is round over four thousand years ago).
The following are a few LAWS of SCIENCE:
The 1st law of thermodynamics.
The 2nd law of thermodynamics.
The law of cause and effect.
The law of biogenesis.
The conservation of angular momentum.
Darwinist evolution unblushingly violates EACH of these LAWS of SCIENCE, but when real scientists try to point out this fact they are ostracized by the Darwinists.
I know this is hard for you to understand but a scientist demanding that Darwinism be accepted despite it's totally unscientific basis, is what is known as blind faith.
However, I am not demanding any kind of proof. All I asked for is an EXAMPLE of "AT LEAST one single undisputed example of evolution OTHER than micro evolution." Out of the TRILLIONS claimed by Darwinists that should be easy enough. |
mcmartin..
Posts: 1436 |
Posted by: mcmartin27 on the 15th 2008f Apr @ 16:51 |
|
This is like playing the "WHY" game. When someone asks you a question, just ask WHY, eventually you come back to the answer, God!!! But you answer God because you have no other explanation. Religion has been just that for thousands of years, an explanation to the unknown.
That's it. If God is around, great, if not we all die anyway! Point being is that you can argue till you are blue in the face about god and evolution. Facts are observable and it has been observed thanks to the dirty English skyline of during the industrial revolution the immediate change in color of a particular moth outside of the cities so that it can continuously blend in and not get eaten. That was in less than two years. So was it god? Only evolution? Or god by already programming those little cells you are talking about so he doesn't have to do everything? If go were DA MAN, I'd bet he's more of a delegator.
Oh, and evolution doesn't violate the law's of thermodynamics, they discuss energy and heat and its governed transference and how much is lost or needed. Not applicable here except with this. If you can believe in laws like gravity, thermodynamics, or even the periodic chart of elements which clearly define the make up of certain elements that are set, then it might not be a stretch to believe that there is a law of evolution and our cells are smarter than we think.
I hate to do this, it makes the post longer, but what happens to all the other organelles in a cell when division takes place? Only some go one way and other into the other cell. What are those little guys that are sent out to “check” the cell to only return and report that the cell needs to start making say, the mitochondria? That’s one smart and efficient machine wouldn’t you say. God? Evolution? Or Both? NO ONE REALLY KNOWS, but what we can prove here and now is evolution is a process, a long fucking process that is going on, if god wants to show up, then Great, we’ll have a lot of wine to party if he’s Jesus… God please be Jesus, I like wine! |
Alacrity
Posts: 3777 |
Posted by: Alacrity on the 16th 2008f Apr @ 08:00 |
|
All I ask for is an EXAMPLE of "AT LEAST one single undisputed example of evolution OTHER than MICRO evolution." Out of the TRILLIONS claimed by Darwinists that should be easy enough.
|
boyjohn
Posts: 4444 |
Posted by: boyjohn on the 09th 2008f May @ 18:43 |
|
|
|
|
Movies 7904
Pictures 2096
Games 290
Animations 135
Links 474
Other 80
Music 83
